Posts tagged with "BlogMore"

blogmore.el v4.1

1 min read

Following on from yesterday's experiment with webp I got to thinking that it might be handy to add a wee command to blogmore.el that can quickly swap an image's extension from whatever it is to webp.

So v4.1 has happened. The new command is simple enough, called blogmore-webpify-image-at-point; it just looks to see if there's a Markdown image on the current line and, if there is, replaces the file's extension with webp no matter what it was before.

If/when I decide to convert all the png files in the blog to webp I'll obviously use something very batch-oriented, but for now I'm still experimenting, so going back and quickly changing the odd image here and there is a nicely cautious approach.

I have, of course, added the command to the transient menu that is brought up by the blogmore command.

One other small change in v4.1 is that a newly created post is saved right away. This doesn't make a huge difference, but it does mean I start out with a saved post that will be seen by BlogMore when generating the site.

I should use webp

2 min read

For a good while now I've been pretty happy with the PageSpeed measurements of this blog, which in turn means I've been happy with the state of what's generated by BlogMore. I have pretty much everything that can be minified nice and minimal. At this point, the main thing that causes the speed measurement to fluctuate is image sizes.

I use a lot of PNGs on this blog. When I'm using images, they're almost always in posts that include screenshots, which in turn pretty much demand that I use a lossless format. When I take these screenshots I don't worry too much about the dimensions (within reason), and of course I don't really do anything to optimise how they'll work and appear on different display sizes. If I was to get too into that, it would add friction to writing something, and the whole point of this is to feel less friction when it comes to sitting at the keyboard.

So I've been living with the fact that some images can be pretty big. While I do make a point of using pngcrush on every image, it generally doesn't make a huge saving.

Then yesterday I read this post on Andy's blog and I suddenly realised what I had to do!

I should use webp

Borrowing from what Andy did, I used mogrify too, setting up this Fish abbr in my Fish configuration:

if type -q mogrify
    abbr -g mkwebp "mogrify -format webp -define webp:lossless=true -quality 100"
end

In my case, at least in the initial experiment, I decided to keep it all lossless. So far the results have been really good, cutting the image sizes down by a significant amount. For example, if I look at the images for yesterday's posts:

 90581 15 Apr 18:14 sl-overview.png
 33446 16 Apr 20:23 sl-overview.webp
392661 15 Apr 18:14 slstats-region-info.png
225392 16 Apr 20:23 slstats-region-info.webp
 36049 15 Apr 19:39 year-chart.png
 15590 16 Apr 20:23 year-chart.webp

That's a pretty reasonable saving!

So far all I've done is convert the few latest posts that make up the front page of my blog, just so I can see what impact it has. I'm getting improved load times on mobile, for sure.

There are a couple of downsides to this, of course.

  1. Now I want to do the whole blog, so while I can easily go through and convert all the png files to webp, converting all the image markup in the Markdown files isn't quite so simple, and even if I do write something to automate it, I'm then going to want to review it to make 100% sure nothing has broken.
  2. I can't just then remove all the png files to cut back on the space used by the generated site. The front page of the site has a feed, and all the categories have a feed each too. This means that there could be HTML out there from some of my oldest posts, referring to the png files, and just removing them will result in broken images.

Overall though, it might be worth doing at some point soon. Meanwhile, from now on, I think I'm going to replace my pngcrush step with a mkwebp step and just use webp instead of png now.

I guess I'm all modern now!

BlogMore v2.14.0

1 min read

Quick little update for BlogMore, with a bump up to v2.14.0. This release comes from another feature request from Andy1, where he asked if it would be possible to have a year-based bar chart in the stats page.

Funnily enough I'd been thinking about the same thing just yesterday. I'd been wondering if it was worth adding, or if it would be overkill given the numbers can be seen in the archive. Having been asked by someone else... that was all the prompting I needed to kick that off.

Posts per year for my blog

Now I'm glad I did this. I like the result, it's a different way to visualise the values, and it's yet another way for people to discover past posts on the blog.

For sure BlogMore is now feature complete.


  1. Who recently wrote an interesting article about his experience of migrating his blog from Hugo to BlogMore 

BlogMore v2.13.0

1 min read

Following on from yesterday's release of BlogMore, I've been looking at some more information in the Google Search Console, which helped me uncover a couple more bugs in relation to URL generation.

This time I noticed a couple of issues, both related to the clean_urls setting. The first was that, in the recently added calendar page, all of the URLs for the links into the date-based archive weren't taking clean_urls into account. That's now fixed.

The second problem was the canonical <link> tag in the headers of the various archive pages (categories, tags, date-based): none of the URLs used in the tag were being cleaned up if clean_urls was true. That's now also fixed.

The main "problem" those two issues were causing was Google was seeing the sitemap for my blog declare one URL, but discovering different versions of the URL elsewhere; the main offending part here being the canonical URL declaration that disagreed with the sitemap.

To the best of my understanding the above fixes should clean a lot of that up.

Also in this new release is a small new feature. After cleaning up the sitemap generation in v2.12.0 I got to thinking that, perhaps, there would be occasions where a user would want to be able to add extra items to the sitemap. With this in mind I've added the sitemap_extras configuration property. With this you can declare extra URLs to drop into the sitemap, if one is being generated.

sitemap_extras:
  - /some/path/
  - /some/file.html

I don't think I have a use for this right now, I'm not sure I'll ever have a use for it, but it feels like a low-cost feature to add that could be useful to someone at some point.

BlogMore v2.12.0

1 min read

Since kicking off building BlogMore and swapping this blog over to using it I've been playing with the Google Search Console. It's something I've not used in decades, but felt it was time to dip back in again and understand how it works these days.

There are two motivations for this: the first is that, when it comes to my day job, I have cause to interact with people who do use the search console a lot, and so it's worth understanding what they work with and why it matters to them. The second reason is it's a reasonable measure of how good a site BlogMore generates.

Page index inclusion progress

So far the results have been pretty good, and the console has helped me find oddities and things that need tidying up.

So this release of BlogMore includes a couple of changes that stem from looking at the latest updates in the console.

The first is that I've cleaned up how the sitemap.xml gets generated. I noticed that if I had any HTML inside my extras directory it was turning up in the sitemap; something I didn't intend and didn't want. So that's now fixed: only pages generated by BlogMore will appear in sitemap.xml1.

The second is that the stats page, despite being in the sitemap, had a noindex header for some reason. That's now been fixed. The only generated page I've intentionally set up so that it isn't indexed is the search page.

Finally, there's one change unrelated to the above: I realised that if you have with_read_time set to false, the reading time stats still appeared on the stats page; that seems unnecessary and unwanted on a site that doesn't show reading times. So, as of v2.12.0, that section of the stats won't show if reading times are turned off.


  1. Now I think about it, I suppose there might be occasion where someone wants extra HTML to appear in the sitemap. I might consider the idea of allowing extra entries to be declared via the configuration file. 

BlogMore v2.11.0

2 min read

After adding the streak display to the stats a couple of days back, I got a little more obsessed with knowing what sort of runs of days of posting to the blog I had. I even said in that post:

It almost makes me want to do a whole-blog-lifetime version of it, or perhaps some sort of more calendar-oriented version of the archive.

Despite saying that I fancied the idea of that calendar-type view, first off I got to thinking it would be interesting to see a table of my 10 longest streaks. So that got added and can now be found in the stats page.

A table of my 10 longest streaks

Having added that, I kept thinking about the whole-blog visual view of "here's the whole time of the blog, and here are the days you posted". I did think it might be interesting to use the same style and layout as the streak display -- perhaps something that would look like my whole contribution history on GitHub that I wrote about back in 2023 -- but the problem with that is it's tricky to make it work well on all display types. I needed something that would collapse better on smaller displays.

So I decided that a more conventional calendar display might work better. While it took a bit of work to get it to really land as I wanted, it turned out pretty much how I wanted.

So now there is a with_calendar configuration option that, if set to true, will add a calendar link at the top of the site. By default it looks like this:

The default calendar view

If it looks a little unconventional at first glance, that's because it is. I wanted something that started with the most recent month in which there's a post, and which then worked backwards. This way I can see things as a proper history. But I can also see that this might seem odd to some people. Given this, I've also added a forward_calendar configuration option that can be used (when set to true), to flip the calendar into a more normal flow.

The alternative calendar view

As you might expect, the calendar links to other parts of the site: clicking on a day with a post takes you to the archive for that day, clicking on a month name where there are posts in a month takes you to the archive for that month, and the same again for a year title.

I'm pretty pleased with the result. In testing it seems nicely responsive to different display types and I'm also finding it to be yet another interesting way to discover older posts (and get a sense of when I was encouraged to post going back over the last 11 years of this particular blog1).

One final little feature I've added is a small enhancement to the read time that can appear on each post. While it's long since been possible to decide if you want it there or not, the calculation itself has been hard-wired to the assumption that 200 wpm is the reading speed of the reader. I've now added read_time_wpm as a configuration option so you can set it to suit your own taste.


  1. I have other, much older, blogs out there on the net. One day I might merge them with this one and back-fill the whole thing. 

BlogMore v2.10.0

1 min read

I've released an update to BlogMore, with another little straightforward addition. This time I'm revisiting the statistics page and adding a streak tracker, of sorts.

My blog streak

Modelled after the GitHub contribution tracker, or indeed any number of other streak trackers, it shows which days in the recent past I've blogged on, and also an indication of how many posts I've made that day.

Of course, it's not quite a full streak tracker. It's only going to show the days up to the day the site was last generated; so when a reader visits and looks, if you've not generated the site for a month, it's not going to show that you've not blogged for a month1. The point is that if you last blog in January, come March or so the reader isn't going to see 2 months of empty days, until you regenerate the site.

So, not perfect, but good enough I think. Also it gives the reader another method of discovering posts (each cell will take them to the archive for that day, so they can read the post or posts for that day).

I've also tried to make it vaguely responsive. There are narrower date ranges as the display gets narrower. We start out at 10 months (as you can see above), then drop to 9 months:

Last nine months

and then dropping to 5 months once we get to mobile-type screens:

Just five months

For all its flaws, I feel it's kind of fun and I like it as a new discovery tool. It almost makes me want to do a whole-blog-lifetime version of it, or perhaps some sort of more calendar-oriented version of the archive. For now though I'm going to settle with this and see if it encourages me to keep up a blogging streak.

While it isn't my intention to write posts for the sake of it, I am enjoying writing something more frequently, so this might just help keep me doing that.


  1. I could solve this problem by having the whole thing generated on the fly with some JavaScript, but that felt like it wasn't in the spirit of a static site generator. 

blogmore.el v4.0

2 min read

Despite having bumped it from 2.x to 3.x yesterday, I'm calling v4.0 on blogmore.el today. There's a good reason for this though. While tinkering with some of the configuration yesterday, and also answering a configuration question last night, I realised that it made sense to make some of the internals into public utility functions.

Now, sure, Emacs Lisp doesn't really have internals in the private function sense, but I've always liked the approach that a package-- prefix communicates "internal, might go away" vs package- which tells me "this is a stable part of the API of this package". With this in mind I've always tried to write my code using this convention. I did this with blogmore.el too and a lot of the code had the blogmore-- prefix.

There's plenty of code in there that someone might want to make use of, if they wanted to add their own commands, or do fun things with the configuration. So with this in mind I've "promoted" a bunch of code to being "public" and, in that case, I feel this deserves another major version bump1.

Things that are now part of the "public" interface include:

  • blogmore-clean-time-string
  • blogmore-get-frontmatter
  • blogmore-remove-frontmatter
  • blogmore-set-frontmatter
  • blogmore-slug
  • blogmore-toggle-frontmatter
  • blogmore-with-post

Each one is documented via its docstring (just a quick Ctrl+h f function-name RET away) and hopefully is pretty self-explanatory.

blogmore-with-post is especially handy as it provides a quick and easy way of pulling information from a post file. So something like this:

(blogmore-with-post "~/write/davep.github.com/content/posts/2026/04/2026-04-05-blogmore-el-v3-1.md"
  (list
   (blogmore-get-frontmatter "title")
   (blogmore-get-frontmatter "date")))

resulting in:

("blogmore.el v3.1" "2026-04-05 20:04:44+0100")

Meaning that this snippet from yesterday's post:

(with-temp-buffer
  (insert-file-contents-literally file)
  (parse-iso8601-time-string
   (blogmore--clean-time-string (blogmore--get-frontmatter-property "date"))))

becomes:

(blogmore-with-post file
  (parse-iso8601-time-string
   (blogmore-clean-time-string (blogmore-get-frontmatter "date"))))

Not massively different, but it reads better and now all the calls are to the "public API" of the package.

Not all the changes are "promoted internals". I've also added a blogmore-remove-tag command (and also added it to the transient menu).

Removing a tag

I've also changed the way that blogmore-add-tag works so that, now, if it's called from the transient, it immediately goes back to the tag input prompt, allowing for another tag to be immediately selected (you can quit out of this with Ctrl+g). Removal of a tag works in a similar way, making things a lot quicker.

I've also added some extra tests too, which makes it even easier for me to make future changes with confidence. The more I work with it the more I appreciate that ERT is available.


  1. Ordinarily it shouldn't matter as the public interface isn't changing, but some of the "internal" functions had been mentioned as options for configuration. 

blogmore.el v3.1

3 min read

When I first started writing blogmore.el it was just going to be a handful of commands that let me spin up a new blog post, and insert the odd link here and there when needed. Initially it only handled a single blog, and everything it did was based around how I lay my personal blog out, and was also very much geared to how I'd made BlogMore work.

But then I wanted to use it to edit both my personal blog and my photoblog. So then I had to add support for configuring different ways of laying out posts for different blogs, etc.

Still, it was mostly written as a personal tool that worked for my stuff. I tried to make it so that it was easy enough to configure (and let's be fair: it's for Emacs and written in Emacs Lisp, it's kind of hard to not be very configurable if you're happy to get your hands dirty with some coding), but there were still some parts of it that weren't as easy to change as I'd have liked.

Also, when I'd originally added the multi-blog configuration, I'd chosen a format for the list of blogs that was an assoc-list of pure lists wrapped by a cl-defstruct to make for easier access. It worked well but was very positional in its nature.

So when the request came in to be able to have better control over the name of the file when starting a new post, which meant I was going to need to rearrange the structure again, it was time to try and do something about it.

Which is how I'm now on v3.1 (yes, there was a v3.0 but I quickly found something in that that needed fixing1). It's a major version bump because I've totally changed how the blogmore-blogs variable holds the data.

From now on I'm using EIEIO to create a class that holds all of the data for a given blog. This, I believe, makes the code easier to read and should also make it more resilient to the addition of any new properties. Also thanks to how such classes can work with the customize system the customize experience remains pretty much the same too.

Personally I don't use the customize UI, instead I declare everything via use-package. As of the time of writing my declaration for blogmore looks like this:

(use-package blogmore
  :ensure t
  :defer t
  :vc (:url "https://github.com/davep/blogmore.el" :rev :newest)
  :init
  (add-hook 'blogmore-new-post-hook #'end-it)
  (blogmore-work-on "blog.davep.org")
  :custom
  (blogmore-blogs
   (list
    (blogmore-blog
     :title "blog.davep.org"
     :posts-directory "~/write/davep.github.com/content/posts/"
     :post-subdirectory-function (lambda () (format-time-string "%Y/%m/")))
    (blogmore-blog
     :title "seen-by.davep.dev"
     :posts-directory "~/write/seen-by/content/posts/")))
  :bind
  ("<f12> b" . blogmore))

There's a bunch of other changes and tweaks under the hood in this release too. All of these should come together to make blogmore.el a little more configurable than it was before. I think, to get the best out of it, anyone wanting to configure it "just so" for their purposes will still have to do a little bit of work, which makes me want to spend some time soon writing some proper documentation, complete with examples of how you might achieve different things.

One big change I've made under the hood is to the code that is used when you insert a link to a post (blogmore-link-post). When this runs it lets me pick a file in your filesystem that is a post from my currently-active blog. Once it has the filename it needs to turn it into a root-relative link. So this:

~/write/davep.github.com/content/posts/2026/04/01/2026-04-01-foo.md

needs to become:

/2026/04/01/foo.html

Until now I just did some regexp faffing that took the 2026-04-01- at the start of the filename and swapped each - for /. Nice and easy. Simple enough to code up and get things working a few weeks back. Not at all flexible.

So as a proof-of-concept of how sophisticated someone could get with configuring this I've changed blogmore-default-post-maker-function from this:

(defcustom blogmore-default-post-maker-function
  (lambda (file)
    (replace-regexp-in-string
     (rx bos (group (+ digit)) "-" (group (+ digit)) "-" (group (+ digit)) "-")
     "\\1/\\2/\\3/"
     (file-name-base (file-name-sans-extension file))))
  "Default function to generate a link for a blog post from its filename."
  :type 'function
  :group 'blogmore)

and turned it into this:

(defcustom blogmore-default-post-maker-function
  (lambda (file)
    (format
     "%s/%s"
     (format-time-string
      "%Y/%m/%d"
      (with-temp-buffer
        (insert-file-contents-literally file)
        (parse-iso8601-time-string
         (blogmore--clean-time-string (blogmore--get-frontmatter-property "date")))))
     (replace-regexp-in-string
      (rx bol (= 4 digit) "-" (= 2 digit) "-" (= 2 digit) "-")
      ""
      (file-name-base file))))
  "Default function to generate a link for a blog post from its filename."
  :type 'function
  :group 'blogmore)

So whereas before I was simply messing with the file's name, now I'm loading the date frontmatter from the chosen file and using that to create the date portion of the path in the URL that I use on my blog. The benefit here is that someone might want to keep the date portion of the path in the URL, but never want it as part of the Markdown source file's name, and so this change means they can call the file anything they want; it doesn't look at that but instead uses the actual date from the post's frontmatter.

I think this nicely demonstrates that, especially thanks to how powerful Emacs and Emacs Lisp are, it's fairly easy to make blogmore.el work just the way you want. I think I've provided almost all the hooks necessary to configure it all sorts of ways, but if you do happen to use it and run into something I might have missed, let me know.


  1. I have at least two slightly different date formats going on in my Markdown and Emacs' parse-iso8601-time-string is kind of picky. So I added a function to try and clean that up

BlogMore v2.9.0

1 min read

After releasing blogmore.el v2.6 this morning, I noticed something about the post: the text that was marked up with <kbd> wasn't really standing out as keys. In blog posts, as in documentation, if I mention the name of a key, I like to mark it up with <kbd>. Ideally, with such markup, the styling of the page it's being used on will make it clear that it's supposed to be read as a key.

I've never put any such styling into the default styles made available in BlogMore.

So here we are with BlogMore v2.9.0, now with a bit of markup, and theme support, for keys marked up with <kbd>. So now, hopefully, if I say you should press Ctrl+F4 to make this blog look better, those keys should stand out a little better than they used to.