Posts tagged with "BlogMore"

Despite having bumped it from 2.x to 3.x yesterday, I'm calling v4.0 on blogmore.el today. There's a good reason for this though. While tinkering with some of the configuration yesterday, and also answering a configuration question last night, I realised that it made sense to make some of the internals into public utility functions.

Now, sure, Emacs Lisp doesn't really have internals in the private function sense, but I've always liked the approach that a package-- prefix communicates "internal, might go away" vs package- which tells me "this is a stable part of the API of this package". With this in mind I've always tried to write my code using this convention. I did this with blogmore.el too and a lot of the code had the blogmore-- prefix.

There's plenty of code in there that someone might want to make use of, if they wanted to add their own commands, or do fun things with the configuration. So with this in mind I've "promoted" a bunch of code to being "public" and, in that case, I feel this deserves another major version bump¹.

Things that are now part of the "public" interface include:

• blogmore-clean-time-string
• blogmore-get-frontmatter
• blogmore-remove-frontmatter
• blogmore-set-frontmatter
• blogmore-slug
• blogmore-toggle-frontmatter
• blogmore-with-post

Each one is documented via its docstring (just a quick Ctrl+h f function-name RET away) and hopefully is pretty self-explanatory.

blogmore-with-post is especially handy as it provides a quick and easy way of pulling information from a post file. So something like this:

(blogmore-with-post "~/write/davep.github.com/content/posts/2026/04/2026-04-05-blogmore-el-v3-1.md"
  (list
   (blogmore-get-frontmatter "title")
   (blogmore-get-frontmatter "date")))

resulting in:

("blogmore.el v3.1" "2026-04-05 20:04:44+0100")

Meaning that this snippet from yesterday's post:

(with-temp-buffer
  (insert-file-contents-literally file)
  (parse-iso8601-time-string
   (blogmore--clean-time-string (blogmore--get-frontmatter-property "date"))))

becomes:

(blogmore-with-post file
  (parse-iso8601-time-string
   (blogmore-clean-time-string (blogmore-get-frontmatter "date"))))

Not massively different, but it reads better and now all the calls are to the "public API" of the package.

Not all the changes are "promoted internals". I've also added a blogmore-remove-tag command (and also added it to the transient menu).

I've also changed the way that blogmore-add-tag works so that, now, if it's called from the transient, it immediately goes back to the tag input prompt, allowing for another tag to be immediately selected (you can quit out of this with Ctrl+g). Removal of a tag works in a similar way, making things a lot quicker.

I've also added some extra tests too, which makes it even easier for me to make future changes with confidence. The more I work with it the more I appreciate that ERT is available.

When I first started writing blogmore.el it was just going to be a handful of commands that let me spin up a new blog post, and insert the odd link here and there when needed. Initially it only handled a single blog, and everything it did was based around how I lay my personal blog out, and was also very much geared to how I'd made BlogMore work.

But then I wanted to use it to edit both my personal blog and my photoblog. So then I had to add support for configuring different ways of laying out posts for different blogs, etc.

Still, it was mostly written as a personal tool that worked for my stuff. I tried to make it so that it was easy enough to configure (and let's be fair: it's for Emacs and written in Emacs Lisp, it's kind of hard to not be very configurable if you're happy to get your hands dirty with some coding), but there were still some parts of it that weren't as easy to change as I'd have liked.

Also, when I'd originally added the multi-blog configuration, I'd chosen a format for the list of blogs that was an assoc-list of pure lists wrapped by a cl-defstruct to make for easier access. It worked well but was very positional in its nature.

So when the request came in to be able to have better control over the name of the file when starting a new post, which meant I was going to need to rearrange the structure again, it was time to try and do something about it.

Which is how I'm now on v3.1 (yes, there was a v3.0 but I quickly found something in that that needed fixing¹). It's a major version bump because I've totally changed how the blogmore-blogs variable holds the data.

From now on I'm using EIEIO to create a class that holds all of the data for a given blog. This, I believe, makes the code easier to read and should also make it more resilient to the addition of any new properties. Also thanks to how such classes can work with the customize system the customize experience remains pretty much the same too.

Personally I don't use the customize UI, instead I declare everything via use-package. As of the time of writing my declaration for blogmore looks like this:

(use-package blogmore
  :ensure t
  :defer t
  :vc (:url "https://github.com/davep/blogmore.el" :rev :newest)
  :init
  (add-hook 'blogmore-new-post-hook #'end-it)
  (blogmore-work-on "blog.davep.org")
  :custom
  (blogmore-blogs
   (list
    (blogmore-blog
     :title "blog.davep.org"
     :posts-directory "~/write/davep.github.com/content/posts/"
     :post-subdirectory-function (lambda () (format-time-string "%Y/%m/")))
    (blogmore-blog
     :title "seen-by.davep.dev"
     :posts-directory "~/write/seen-by/content/posts/")))
  :bind
  ("<f12> b" . blogmore))

There's a bunch of other changes and tweaks under the hood in this release too. All of these should come together to make blogmore.el a little more configurable than it was before. I think, to get the best out of it, anyone wanting to configure it "just so" for their purposes will still have to do a little bit of work, which makes me want to spend some time soon writing some proper documentation, complete with examples of how you might achieve different things.

One big change I've made under the hood is to the code that is used when you insert a link to a post (blogmore-link-post). When this runs it lets me pick a file in your filesystem that is a post from my currently-active blog. Once it has the filename it needs to turn it into a root-relative link. So this:

~/write/davep.github.com/content/posts/2026/04/01/2026-04-01-foo.md

needs to become:

/2026/04/01/foo.html

Until now I just did some regexp faffing that took the 2026-04-01- at the start of the filename and swapped each - for /. Nice and easy. Simple enough to code up and get things working a few weeks back. Not at all flexible.

So as a proof-of-concept of how sophisticated someone could get with configuring this I've changed blogmore-default-post-maker-function from this:

(defcustom blogmore-default-post-maker-function
  (lambda (file)
    (replace-regexp-in-string
     (rx bos (group (+ digit)) "-" (group (+ digit)) "-" (group (+ digit)) "-")
     "\\1/\\2/\\3/"
     (file-name-base (file-name-sans-extension file))))
  "Default function to generate a link for a blog post from its filename."
  :type 'function
  :group 'blogmore)

and turned it into this:

(defcustom blogmore-default-post-maker-function
  (lambda (file)
    (format
     "%s/%s"
     (format-time-string
      "%Y/%m/%d"
      (with-temp-buffer
        (insert-file-contents-literally file)
        (parse-iso8601-time-string
         (blogmore--clean-time-string (blogmore--get-frontmatter-property "date")))))
     (replace-regexp-in-string
      (rx bol (= 4 digit) "-" (= 2 digit) "-" (= 2 digit) "-")
      ""
      (file-name-base file))))
  "Default function to generate a link for a blog post from its filename."
  :type 'function
  :group 'blogmore)

So whereas before I was simply messing with the file's name, now I'm loading the date frontmatter from the chosen file and using that to create the date portion of the path in the URL that I use on my blog. The benefit here is that someone might want to keep the date portion of the path in the URL, but never want it as part of the Markdown source file's name, and so this change means they can call the file anything they want; it doesn't look at that but instead uses the actual date from the post's frontmatter.

I think this nicely demonstrates that, especially thanks to how powerful Emacs and Emacs Lisp are, it's fairly easy to make blogmore.el work just the way you want. I think I've provided almost all the hooks necessary to configure it all sorts of ways, but if you do happen to use it and run into something I might have missed, let me know.

After releasing blogmore.el v2.6 this morning, I noticed something about the post: the text that was marked up with <kbd> wasn't really standing out as keys. In blog posts, as in documentation, if I mention the name of a key, I like to mark it up with <kbd>. Ideally, with such markup, the styling of the page it's being used on will make it clear that it's supposed to be read as a key.

I've never put any such styling into the default styles made available in BlogMore.

So here we are with BlogMore v2.9.0, now with a bit of markup, and theme support, for keys marked up with <kbd>. So now, hopefully, if I say you should press Ctrl+F4 to make this blog look better, those keys should stand out a little better than they used to.

There's no question that the experiment that is BlogMore has resulted in me blogging more. Although my previous setup wasn't exactly all friction, there's something about "owning" most of the tools and really knowing how they work, and being able to quickly modify them so they work "just so", that makes me more inclined to quickly write something up.

I can see this if I look at the numbers in the archive for this blog. In March alone I wrote 43 posts; that's more than I wrote in any whole year, other than 2023. While I suspect this will start to calm down as work on BlogMore and blogmore.el settles down, I sense I'll be writing a bit more often for some time to come.

Because of this I decided to do a little bit of housekeeping on the posts directory in the blog's source repository. Originally I had the Markdown source for every post all in one directory. Then last month I broke those down by year. Then earlier today, seeing how this year is going, I decided to break 2026 down by month.

Then I realised I had a problem in blogmore.el. It assumed that the Markdown file for a new post (blogmore-new) would always be created in a subdirectory named after the year, underneath the defined posts directory. Until today that was the case¹, but now I wanted it to work differently.

So this is why I'm making a second release in one day: I added the ability to configure the subdirectory where a new post is created. I've changed the default now so that it assumes the user wants the subdirectory to be YYYY/MM/DD (because more granular feels like the right default). In my case I don't want that, I just want YYYY/MM, but now I can configure that. The value that is set is a function that returns the name of the subdirectory, so in the case of my blog I have it as:

(lambda () (format-time-string "%Y/%m/"))

On the other hand, for my photoblog I want the full date as a subdirectory so I can leave it as the default. The whole use-package for blogmore now looks like:

(use-package blogmore
  :ensure t
  :defer t
  :vc (:url "https://github.com/davep/blogmore.el" :rev :newest)
  :init
  (add-hook 'blogmore-new-post-hook #'end-it)
  (blogmore-work-on "blog.davep.org")
  :custom
  (blogmore-blogs
   '(("blog.davep.org"
      ;; Root directory for posts.
      "~/write/davep.github.com/content/posts/"
      ;; Subdirectory for new posts, relative to the root.
      (lambda () (format-time-string "%Y/%m/")))
     ("seen-by.davep.dev"
      ;; Root directory for posts.
      "~/write/seen-by/content/posts/")))
  :bind
  ("<f12> b" . blogmore))

Technically this is a breaking change because it bumps the meaning of each "position" in the values within blogmore-blogs. However, in my case, because I was only ever defining the blog name and the top-level directory for the posts (both mandatory), this didn't break anything; I also strongly suspect nobody else is using this so I very much doubt I'm messing with someone else's setup². If I have I apologise; do let me know.

Anyway, all of this goes to explain why the heck I made two releases of the same package back to back in the same day. This is what happens when my namesake is having fun outside and so I just want to sit on the sofa, hack on some code, and watch the chaos in the garden.

Like most people, I imagine, I first ran into transient when first using magit. I took to it pretty quickly and it's always made sense to me as a user interface. But... I've never used it for any code I've ever written.

I think, incorrectly, I'd half assumed it was going to be some faff to set up, and of course for a good while it wasn't part of Emacs anyway. Given this, I'd always had it filed under the heading "that's so neat I'll give it a go one day but not at the moment".

Meanwhile... ever since I did the last big revamp of my Emacs configuration, I found myself leaning into a command binding approach that does the whole prefix-letter-letter thing. For reasons I can't actually remember I fell into the habit of using F12¹ as my chosen prefix key. As such, over the past 10 or so years (since I greatly overhauled my Emacs setup), I've got into setting up bindings for commands that follow this prefix convention.

So when I created blogmore.el I set up the commands following this pattern.

(use-package blogmore
  :ensure t
  :defer t
  :vc (:url "https://github.com/davep/blogmore.el" :rev :newest)
  :init
  (add-hook 'blogmore-new-post-hook #'end-it)
  (blogmore-work-on "blog.davep.org")
  :custom
  (blogmore-blogs
   '(("blog.davep.org" "~/write/davep.github.com/content/posts/")
     ("seen-by.davep.dev" "~/write/seen-by/content/posts/")))
  :bind
  ("<f12> b b" . blogmore-work-on)
  ("<f12> b n" . blogmore-new)
  ("<f12> b e" . blogmore-edit)
  ("<f12> b d" . blogmore-toggle-draft)
  ("<f12> b s c" . blogmore-set-category)
  ("<f12> b a t" . blogmore-add-tag)
  ("<f12> b u d" . blogmore-update-date)
  ("<f12> b u m" . blogmore-update-modified)
  ("<f12> b l p" . blogmore-link-post)
  ("<f12> b l c" . blogmore-link-category)
  ("<f12> b l t" . blogmore-link-tag))

It works well, it makes it nice and easy to remember the bindings, etc. Nobody needs me to sell them on the merits of this approach.

Then I got to thinking last night: why am I setting up all those bindings when I could probably do it all via a transient? So that was the moment to actually RTFM and get it going. The first version was incredibly quick to get up and running and I was kicking myself that I'd taken so long to actually look at the package properly.

This morning I've worked on it a little more and the final form is still pretty straightforward.

(transient-define-prefix blogmore ()
  "Show a transient for BlogMore commands."
  [:description
   (lambda ()
     (format "BlogMore: %s\n"
             (if (blogmore--chosen-blog-sans-error)
                 (blogmore--blog-title)
               "No blog selected")))
   ["Blog"
    ("b"  "Select blog" blogmore-work-on)]
   ["Post"
    ("n" "New post" blogmore-new :inapt-if-not blogmore--chosen-blog-sans-error)
    ("e" "Edit post" blogmore-edit :inapt-if-not blogmore--chosen-blog-sans-error)
    ("d" "Toggle draft status" blogmore-toggle-draft :inapt-if-not blogmore--blog-post-p)
    ("c" "Set post category" blogmore-set-category :inapt-if-not blogmore--blog-post-p)
    ("t" "Add tag" blogmore-add-tag :inapt-if-not blogmore--blog-post-p)
    ("u d" "Update date" blogmore-update-date :inapt-if-not blogmore--blog-post-p)
    ("u m" "Update modified date" blogmore-update-modified :inapt-if-not blogmore--blog-post-p)]
   ["Links"
    ("l c" "Link to a category" blogmore-link-category :inapt-if-not blogmore--blog-post-p)
    ("l p" "Link to a post" blogmore-link-post :inapt-if-not blogmore--blog-post-p)
    ("l t" "Link to a tag" blogmore-link-tag :inapt-if-not blogmore--blog-post-p)]])

With this in place I can simplify my use-package quite a bit, just binding a single key to run blogmore.

(use-package blogmore
  :ensure t
  :defer t
  :vc (:url "https://github.com/davep/blogmore.el" :rev :newest)
  :init
  (add-hook 'blogmore-new-post-hook #'end-it)
  (blogmore-work-on "blog.davep.org")
  :custom
  (blogmore-blogs
   '(("blog.davep.org" "~/write/davep.github.com/content/posts/")
     ("seen-by.davep.dev" "~/write/seen-by/content/posts/")))
  :bind
  ("<f12> b" . blogmore))

Now, when I'm working on a blog post, I can just hit F12 b and I get a neat menu:

Better still, because of how transient works, I can ensure that only applicable commands are available, while still showing them all. So if I've not even got a blog selected yet:

Or with a blog selected but not actually working on a post yet:

So far I'm really liking this approach, and I'm tempted to lean into transient more with some of my packages now. While on the surface it does seem that it has the downside of the binding choices being dictated by me, the fact is that the commands are all still there and anyone can use their own bindings, or I guess override the transient itself and do their own thing.

Following on from yesterday's release, I've bumped blogmore.el to v2.5. The main change to the package is the thing I mentioned yesterday about the toggle of the draft status. The draft toggle yesterday was pretty simple, with it working like:

• If there is no draft frontmatter, draft: true is added
• If there is any draft frontmatter, it is removed

This meant that if you had draft: false set and you went to toggle, it would be removed, which is the same as setting it to draft: false.

Unlikely to generally be an issue, but I also couldn't let that stay like that. It bothered me.

So now it works as you'd expect:

• If there is no draft frontmatter, draft: true is added
• If draft: true is there, it is removed
• If draft: false is there, it is set to draft: true

Much better.

Another change is that I fixed a problem with older supported versions of Emacs. I didn't know this was a problem because I'm running 30.2 everywhere. Meanwhile, thanks to package-lint-current-buffer from package-lint.el, I have:

Package-Requires: ((emacs "29.1"))

in the metadata for the package. Turns out though that sort used to require two parameters (the sequence and the predicate), whereas now it's fine with just one (it will accept just the sequence and will default the predicate). So of course blogmore.el was working fine for me, but would have crashed for someone with an earlier Emacs.

As for how I found this out... well I finally, for the first time ever, dived into using ERT to write some tests. While I've used testing frameworks in other languages, I'd never looked at this with Emacs Lisp. It works a treat and is great to work with; I think I'll be using this a lot more from now on.

Having got tests going I realised I should run them with GitHub actions, which then meant I managed to discover setup-emacs. Having found this the next logical step was to set up a matrix test for all the versions of Emacs I expect blogmore.el to work on. This worked fine, except... it didn't. While the tests worked locally, they were failing for some Emacsen over on GitHub.

And that's how I discovered the issue with sort on versions earlier than the one I'm using locally.

All in all, that was a good little period of hacking. New things discovered, the package improved, and a wider range of support for different versions of Emacs.

I've just published v2.8.0 of BlogMore to PyPI. This is a small update which addresses a bug that Andy reported.

The fix was simple enough, and is another little interesting thing to keep in mind given that BlogMore is an ongoing Copilot experiment. When I first kicked off BlogMore I let it decide which library to use to handle Markdown (I'm more used to markdown-it-py via Textual and so via Hike), and so also let it decide which extensions made most sense given the request. I've honestly never run into the idea of metadata before, only ever dealing with or caring about frontmatter¹.

On the other hand, I will say this: I was cooking dinner when the report came in; I pointed Copilot at the issue and let it figure it out. After eating, clearing things away, and general post-dinner chilling, I dropped into the repo to see what it had made of it and... it had figured the issue out and fixed it.

I've just released a little update to blogmore.el, adding blogmore-toggle-draft as a command. This came about in connection with the feature request that resulted in BlogMore v2.7.0 being released.

While I don't personally use draft for my posts, I can see the utility of it and if someone were to happen to use blogmore.el, it could be useful to have this bound to a handy key combination.

As for how it works: that's simple. When run, if there is no draft: frontmatter property, then draft: true is added. If draft: is there it is removed. Yes, it does mean that it will also remove draft: false too but... eh. Okay, fine, I might handle that case as a followup but I couldn't really imagine someone wanting to keep draft: false in the frontmatter.

If a post is ready to go, why bother with a header that means the same thing when it's not there?

Given I've been on a little bit of an Emacs Lisp side quest, it's been a couple or so days since I made a release of BlogMore. Today's release comes after a feature request about draft posts.

While support for marking posts as drafts, and including or excluding them from a build, is something that's been in BlogMore from the start, it's not something I've ever used. These days, when I'm writing a post, especially if it's one that's taking a while to write, I'll do it in a branch and eventually PR into main before publishing. Given this it was useful to get a request relating to the feature as it helps me understand how someone else might use it.

So as of v2.7.0, if a post is marked as a draft, and if drafts are included in the build, it will be pretty obvious:

When the post's title appears in the archive it will also appear obvious that it's still a draft too:

All of this is, of course, modifiable via the template API and via styling, so if the choice of colour or icon doesn't suit it can be modified to taste.

I've bumped blogmore.el to v2.3. The main change in this release, which I've had on my mental to-do list for a couple of days now, revolves around categories, tags and case.

I've got BlogMore set up so that it's pretty relaxed about case when it comes to categories and tags; so when it comes to generated files and URLs everything collapses to lowercase. However, blogmore.el wasn't taking this into account.

While it wasn't a serious issue, it did have the side-effect that, if you had a tag of lisp and a tag of Lisp, both would appear in the list of tags you could complete from. Also, when you went to add a tag to the tags frontmatter (via the blogmore-add-tag command), if you selected Lisp and lisp was already there, you'd end up with both versions after the command finished.

So earlier I changed things up a little; first cleaning up when loading pre-existing values and then ensuring the newly-set tags are deduplicated.

This now means I can edit and update a post even faster, without needing to worry about accidentally duplicating tags. This in turn reduces the friction to writing a post for my blog. That is, after all, the whole point of the name of the package and the blogging tool it's connected to!