Recent Posts

I wasn't made for this. I didn't move to Scotland for this. I don't like this.

Yes, I know it's warmer elsewhere. Yes, I know it's warmer elsewhere in the UK, today.

Whatever.

This is still not fun and I still don't like it.

A quick update to BlogMore that stems from a couple of accessibility concerns raised when using PageSpeed Insights. While the accessibility score on pages generated by BlogMore is pretty excellent (96/100), a couple of things were highlighted that seemed worth tackling in some way.

The first was that the title bar of code blocks is rather low in contrast, especially the name of the language. This was a deliberate choice on my part; when I'd prompted Copilot to do this work some time back I'd expressly asked it to make the text "subtle". While I could have undone that, I do like how it looks and would like to retain it if possible. So, as an experiment, I've used prefers-contrast as a signal that I shouldn't do that. So now there's a bit of extra CSS under prefers-contrast: more which just uses the normal text colour for those headers.

I imagine this won't boost the score on PageSpeed Insights -- presumably it won't simulate that being used -- but I would hope it's an improvement for those who do need the extra contrast.

The other issue that was flagged up was the lack of an underline on the email address link in the comment-via-email invitation box (the optional feature I added back in v2.17.0). That one was an easy fix. There was no reason to avoid an underline on the link, so I added one.

I've just released BlogMore v2.28.0. This release has some small improvements to the JSON-LD structured data that was added in the last release, and also adds support for actually showing author names on posts.

On the latter point first: I only ever really created BlogMore for myself, thinking that perhaps some other folk might use it at some point. All along, though, I had it in mind that it would only ever be used to create a site where there was a single author. Despite this, though, I'd added support for setting the author per-post, and this was reflected in the RSS and Atom feeds.

But I'd never added support for showing the author in posts.

So this release adds that feature. I've tried to add full control, with settings that let you turn on/off showing the author blog-wide, as well as providing control per-post. Also, as well as setting the default author for a blog, and being able to set the author for a specific post, you can do the same for an author's URL (setting it blog-wide and per post).

Obviously, when the author is shown, if a URL can be worked out (the one local to the post is chosen first, then the blog-wide default if one isn't set for the post), the author's name links to their URL.

The JSON-LD changes are a couple of small improvements to the content. The author data adds a url property (following the same rules mentioned above) and the image property for a post will fall back to the site logo (if one is set) when there is no cover.

While I know the subject really fires some people, ad blockers are something I've never really paid too much attention to. Back in the early days of the web, the really early days, I used to run with full-on JavaScript blocking¹. The web changed and I accepted it.

More recently, as I've become a full-time Safari user in the last couple of years, I've been running with Ka-Block! installed. It's been fine. I've never really noticed it. I think it blocked some stuff, but not other stuff. I've never really noticed if it was getting updated or not; I just wasn't paying attention.

Then, this morning, I saw this post in the Fediverse and for some reason it caught my eye. I followed the link, did a bit of searching, asked Misko about his experiences with the app, and saved a bookmark.

Now, this evening, I've thrown down my fiver and I'm running with Wipr 2 installed, both on my Air and my iPhone. When I'm next on either of my Minis, or on my iPad, I'll throw it on there too.

The installation process was straightforward, albeit one where you need to enable four extensions rather than just the one.

As well as that, you then need to enable it in the app itself and you're good to go. I've since tried visiting a couple of locations that I know still showed adverts or consent pop-ups and... clean. So clean!

My expectation for tools like this is that they end up breaking some site in a way you least expect, so I'll be very aware of that for a while. That said, if I do run into a problem, not only is it easy enough to turn blocking off just for that one site, there's a very clear route to reporting problems too.

Mostly, though, I hope I can go back to paying this app no attention whatsoever. If I can, I imagine that's high praise and a job well done for this sort of tool.

Much like the last two releases of BlogMore, this is another that has ended up being on the theme of improving or adorning the generated HTML.

One change in the last release resulted in another HTML validator warning, and so that's cleaned up here (the removal of the h2 elements from the sidebar meant it no longer made sense for it to be a section, so I've turned it into a div).

On top of that, I've also decided to dip my toe into adding more "microformat" type things to the generated code. This release adds things like JSON-LD structured data and Microformats2 semantic markup, where appropriate. I've also updated all of the "socials" links that appear in the sidebar to ensure they're marked up as rel="me".

Given that this is a bit of an experiment, expect to see some tweaks and changes as I roll this out on this blog and then check and test the result. This is a useful learning exercise for me.

The previous release of BlogMore had some work that improved the HTML, ensuring that the HTML validator was happy with the generated code. Yesterday evening I ran it over more of the pages, and found a couple more things that made sense to address.

So v2.26.0 takes this a little further and tries to clean more things up. Changes include:

• The comment email invitation box is now created with a div rather than a section, resolving a validation error about there being no h2 or similar inside the section (because we don't need any kind of heading in there).
• Cleaned up an error relating to the misuse of an aria-label in the graph page.
• Cleaned up an error relating to the misuse of an aria-label in the stats page.
• Removed the h2 elements from the sidebar, making them into divs with the same style. This leaves headings as something that will only appear in the main body of any page or post.
• Added some heading-demoting to the rendering of posts so that the heading structure of any given post is retained when it's part of any of the archive-style pages (date archives, category archives, tag archives, etc).

While not all of the above were being reported as validation errors, all of them should result in HTML that better fits what I'd want in the first place.

As I've written about a few times in the last week or so, the journey with AI-based coding tools has hit an interesting time when it comes to prices, quotas, usage, availability and all that. Having come into all of this via a place where it was a flat fee, and where I didn't really need to think about input tokens and output tokens and so on, I'm pretty ignorant of what that all means in terms of scale. If I'm looking at a new tool and I see prices and/or quotas for in/out tokens, it means nothing to me. I can't relate to it. I've never had to care about it.

While using Gemini CLI to quickly make a change to BlogMore this morning, I was reminded that at the end of a session it does tell me this:

Seeing that got me thinking: is there a way to get the total usage for all of my sessions, or at least the sessions that have still been retained (I'm guessing they expire after a wee while)? After a little bit of searching I found ccusage. That looked exactly like the sort of thing I was after.

Now, this is only going to be good for Gemini (it says it supports Copilot too, but it seems to be failing to find any Copilot sessions), but it should give me a feel for what my token usage looks like.

I work on BlogMore on two different machines: the MacBook Air and also a Mac Mini I have in my office. Here's all of the available token usage data I can get out of the Air:

And also the same for the Mac Mini (which gets used less frequently for this sort of thing):

In both cases I've removed a couple of columns to make the tables fit better. The first was the model name (varying between gemini-3-flash-preview and gemini-3.1-pro-preview), the second was Cache Create (which was always 0 all the way down).

From what I can see, it would appear that these two tables do cover my increasing use of Gemini CLI for doing work on BlogMore (the first intensive use being back around the 5th of this month, if I recall correctly). So this would seem to be a reasonably informative way to view things.

All of which is to say, over a roughly three week period, while getting things done, I've used getting on for 20,000,000 input tokens, and around 600,000 output tokens (presumably I do also need to be keeping the 114,300,000 cache read tokens in mind too). With this in mind I might now be able to make more sense of the pricing I see for various tools.

Now that we're near the end of the free or cheap GitHub Copilot party, I thought it might be interesting to look at how much BlogMore has "cost" me to build, and what it would have cost under the proposed new pricing structure that is coming in next month. While I've looked at the comparison for last month, I've not looked at the whole period I've been seriously using it.

So, for this review, I'm looking at all the data I can pull out of GitHub for the months of February, March, April and May of this year. Development of BlogMore started back in February and, while it hasn't been 100% the cause of my use of Copilot premium requests, it's been almost all of it. For the purposes of this review I'm just going to take the approach that all I worked on was BlogMore.

Remember that, even when I had free access, I had a maximum of 300 premium requests per month. Once I lost free access I had the same number of requests for $10 a month.

Here's how those months broke down:

So, give or take, something that I've actually spent $30.00 on could have, at best, cost me $185.51. That's assuming that the "cost" of the models I was using stays the same. You can see that the costs have risen already in that the predicted price from February, where I used 83% of my premium requests, is a touch under half the cost for this month, where I've used just 11%. From what I can see in the raw data, it's down to some models suddenly being considered more expensive (perhaps I was doing something that just consumed more tokens, I'm not 100% sure if I'm honest, but I don't recall anything that seemed like harder work).

Who knows what the real costs will be come June.

Now, technically, the actual cost under the new regime could or should be $156, because it would be 4 lots of the $39.00/month plan, which would better cover that use¹. Again though, that's assuming the actual cost of using whatever models remains pretty stable. It also assumes that I'd want to spend that much each month, and that I would be correctly anticipating that I'd need that much.

Also, this isn't even the total cost of getting this project done. As I've written recently: I've been using Gemini CLI more this month, and while the usage there is a flat cost, until now, that's changing too.

Now, of course, these aren't the only games in town. I could "go to the source" and just get a sub for Claude Code or something, and as Tim pointed out over in the Fediverse, something like Cursor does a lot of this and is just $20/month. Which all sounds fine, but what happens when those fleeing GitHub Copilot or Gemini CLI/Antigravity head over to something like Cursor? Is it sensible to expect the pricing to stay the same²?

I guess, at this point, I'm just mulling over the same issue time and again, but from different angles. It does seem clear to me, though, that in less than 4 months, in my experiment of "what happens if I use agents to develop a Free Software tool I want?", the market has gone from being entirely reasonable to pretty much unjustifiable from a price point of view.

The recent changes to pricing and usage, in relation to AI, aren't just about agents and coding. Not only have I seen GitHub Copilot and Gemini CLI hugely restrict their offerings for the same price, it's also come to at least one "general" tool I use too.

For a while now, as part of a Google One subscription I keep, I've had a Gemini AI Pro subscription. I've generally found this useful, mainly using the Gemini app on my iPhone to research things¹, and also commonly using the web application to help proofread blog posts, and sometimes explore coding problems. Another way I use it is via NotebookLM. The subscription has meant that I can do all of this without ever having to worry about hitting any usage limits. While I'm sure they were there, I was never aware of them and never hit them.

In the last 48 hours, along with the changes to the coding agent offerings, Gemini itself has moved to a compute-based usage limit approach.

Gemini will move to compute-based usage limits that will refresh every 5 hours until you reach your weekly limit. Calculation of your usage will factor in the complexity of your prompt, the features you use, and the length of your chat. Paid users have higher limits than users without a Google AI subscription.

The thing that bothers me about this -- and I've seen this with other companies in this market too -- is just how vague the wording is. Look at this table that is supposed to inform you about your usage limits, depending on your plan:

Okay, great, thanks to my Pro plan I get 4x the limits. Awesome. But... 4x what exactly? What exactly are the standard limits? How do I assess which plan is better for me? How do I compare Google's product against another offering?

I suspect, for the most part, I'll be fine where I am. So far today I've used Gemini to proofread the previous post I wrote, there was a bit of back and forth as I edited my post, and that cost me 1% of my five hour window.

What impact that has on my weekly usage, I don't know, but based on this it would appear to be almost nothing.

I can appreciate that it's been a bit of a free party for a while, and now each provider has to start to have this cost them less -- if not actually make them money -- before the whole thing collapses. Fair enough. But it's annoying as hell to not be able to gauge what I'm actually getting, or easily compare products.

That's not to say that I know how this can be communicated well. There's a flip-side to all of this. If I go and look at the Anthropic website and their detailed pricing information it seems to take it to the other extreme. There's so much you need to know and understand, and you'd need to know so much about how their models work and how your needs would interact with them... it feels like you need specialised training to comprehend any of it. While I can't find it back at the moment, I seem to remember a similar issue with trying to follow such information with GitHub Copilot.

If it doesn't exist already, I suspect there's a market here for a site that makes it incredibly simple to plug in your requirements and have a product recommendation be made.

Part of my morning routine, when I sit down at my desk, is to run updates. This ritual updates, amongst other things, anything I've installed via Homebrew. As this ran I noticed antigravity-cli turn up as an addition to the index of things to install.

Noticing this, I decided to swap from the "trust me, bro" installation of the CLI app from yesterday to managing this via Homebrew. From what I could tell, cleaning yesterday's installation was just a case of removing the 130MB agy executable that had been dropped in ~/.local/bin.

With that done, I did:

brew install antigravity-cli

and got a failure:

Error: It seems there is already a Binary at '/opt/homebrew/bin/agy'.

When installing antigravity via Homebrew yesterday, I seem to remember seeing that it created an agy command as a wrapper for the GUI app at some point. Assuming this will have been sorted out, I did a quick:

brew reinstall antigravity

followed by:

brew install antigravity-cli

and that all worked.

So, as of right now, I have a working Antigravity GUI application and an Antigravity CLI and both of them are installed via Homebrew.

Feels tidy.